Everything Under the Moon

Superb! Sorry if it takes 1 year plus to reply to your postings, I couldn't help meself to convey my sincere utmost gratitude to your comparison-similarity outlines herein. Just curious though...are there any more that u might missed out? I'm interested to know more, or in any other relevant facts ...

Superb! Sorry if it takes 1 year plus to reply to your postings, I couldn't help meself to convey my sincere utmost gratitude to your comparison-similarity outlines herein. Just curious though...are there any more that u might missed out? I'm interested to know more, or in any other relevant facts ...

and this part "Look now at the behemoth, which I made along with you; He eats grass like an ox." blows the dinosaur theory out of the water... they had much simpler jawbone construction than any bovine. it was more than likely referring to a hippo.

you might have an argument if it weren't for that pesky layer of iridium that separates their remains from ours.

there is more debate in the scientific community about the mechanics of gravity than evolution.

modern humans have been around some 50,000 years. the farthest scope of homo sapien, about 200,000 years. homo erectus goes back almost 2 million years, but we're talking about something not much like us at all in the brain department.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganthropus Extreme claims Meganthropus has been the target of numerous extreme claims, none of which are supported by peer-reviewed authors. Perhaps the most common claim is that Meganthropus was a giant, one unsourced claim put them at 9 feet (2.75 m) tall and 750 to ...

sheelanagig wrote:The Old testament part of the Bible is the History of the Hebrews.

so what happened to that race of giants that were the byproduct of the "sons of god" that had sex with "daughters of man" in genesis chapter 6?

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html#proof "Evolution is only a theory; it hasn't been proved." First, we should clarify what "evolution" means. Like so many other words, it has more than one meaning. Its strict biological definition is "a change in allele...

There's a lot of argument about all this and none can be conclusively proven because it's all subject to interpretation; aside from the accuracy and clarity of written information. The glaring fault about scientific dating has been the Carbon-14 method. Carbon-14 was originally chosen not for its a...

although evolution is taught as a fact there is NO actual PROOF which is why it's called Darwin’s theory . have fun playing with the terminology, but you're comparing the theory of evolution with hypothesis and speculation. there's clear chronological and morphological intermediation found throug...

http://blogs.ngm.com/blog_central/2009/05/darwinius-and-the-real-missing-link.html http://blogs.ngm.com/.a/6a00e009822691883301156fa61c35970c-500wi Why was Eosimias, shown here, left out of a scientific discussion about the origins of monkeys, apes, and humans and the recent announcement of Darwiniu...

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs030.snc1/4296_1061556464195_1384452635_138814_7178365_n.jpg May 19, 2009—Meet "Ida," the small "missing link" found in Germany that's created a big medi...

Hallowhim: sorry, but why is it funny? --------------------- Men raping and abusing women in the bible? And then cutting up her used body and send her out throughout the kingdom? HA HA HA HA. EXTREMLY FUNNY. Not. Once again, reasons why I'm having problems with catholic/ christian doctorine. this i...

Is anyone else fascinated by her? I am hoping someone is and not because the Da Vinci Code is their favorite book, even though it is a good book. I have been fascinated with her for awhile and love talking about her and learning new things about her. So lets talk about her, if someone else is inter...