Plans are moving ahead in 2021 with contracts for Lunar Outpost
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa ... ar-outpost
Going back to the Moon with Artemis
- SpiritTalker
- Banned Member
- Posts: 6237
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:51 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth temporarily
Re: Going back to the Moon with Artemis
thanks to Northrup Grumman we have a toxic water plume under the house
“There are things known and things unknown and in between are the Doors.”
― Jim Morrison
“All I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen.”
― RWEmerson
― Jim Morrison
“All I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen.”
― RWEmerson
- SpiritTalker
- Banned Member
- Posts: 6237
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:51 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth temporarily
Re: Going back to the Moon with Artemis
Grumman’s Not my circus . Hope it’s not in the drinking water - they’d have to desalinate the Pacific Ocean .
My mind wanders over here, and over there... I wonder if it’s true that the elite will leave Earth behind? IMHO the sooner they go the better - b’bye
The NY Times ran a story on 1/26/21 on Harvard prof Avi Loeb’s belief that interstellar Oumuamua could have been a probe. Slow news day - that story’s been kicking around a couple years. It’s a puzzlement how it accelerated out of the solar system. A Sling shot effect around the sun like in Ye olde Star Trek?
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/26/book ... -loeb.html
My mind wanders over here, and over there... I wonder if it’s true that the elite will leave Earth behind? IMHO the sooner they go the better - b’bye
The NY Times ran a story on 1/26/21 on Harvard prof Avi Loeb’s belief that interstellar Oumuamua could have been a probe. Slow news day - that story’s been kicking around a couple years. It’s a puzzlement how it accelerated out of the solar system. A Sling shot effect around the sun like in Ye olde Star Trek?
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/26/book ... -loeb.html
Last edited by SpiritTalker on Tue Feb 16, 2021 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Syntax
Reason: Syntax